The CMO is dead

By Professor Dominique Turpin

 

10 Oct 2012: I have some sad news: the Chief Marketing Officer is dead.

Fortunately, I’m talking about the CMO position rather than a particular person. But the decline of the CMO’s influence is an alarming trend in companies that claim to put the customer first but in reality continue to be product-driven.

CMOs are increasingly powerless and peripheral. The CEO sets the overall strategy, the R&D and innovation teams design the product, and the CFO determines pricing and departmental budgets. The CMO, meanwhile, reports to a chief executive who often has only partial knowledge of the customer. No wonder some CMOs are considering a career change.

The CMO position is dead for several reasons:

  • Most CMOs are not really immersed in marketing activities. By this I mean understanding, creating and delivering value to the customer. Too many CMOs are constrained, focusing on PR and communications and not on products or pricing, so as not to invade the space of the Chief Innovation Officer or the CFO.
  • CFOs have become more powerful. This is partly the result of tough trading conditions and short-term pressure from financial markets. The CFO has taken control of pricing decisions and is winning the race to the very top. The evidence today is that most chief executives have a finance or engineering background, and few come from the ranks of sales and marketing.
  • Marketing impact is often hard to measure. Marketing is more art than science. It’s difficult to quantify the results of a marketing campaign, and to know whether all those millions of dollars spent have led to an increase in real sales. And when a downturn comes, the marketing budget is often the first to be cut.
  • Nobody has a clear idea of what marketing is. It’s fuzzy. Ask 20 senior managers in any company what marketing is, and they will give 20 different answers. By contrast, most people would agree on a definition of finance or production.

 

In some cases, marketing is still powerful and central to the corporate DNA. There are companies with a visionary founder who has a great understanding of the customer, like Steve Jobs at Apple or Ingvar Kamprad at IKEA. And there are family businesses, which are better than public companies at taking the long-term view needed in marketing.

But these cases tend to be the exceptions. At most companies the power of the CMO is being eroded almost by the day. Instead of grieving over this, CMOs can take the following practical steps to reclaim some of their lost power:

  • Get rid of the CMO title, because nobody understands it. Create the new title of CCO – Chief Customer Officer. This person must be the voice of the customer in the organization, taking views and messages from the market and spreading them internally. Changing a job title is clearly not enough, but there are other concrete steps that can be taken.
  • Get the CEO to be the CMO. CEOs can drive the customer-centricity agenda better than anyone else. They have the power to lead a company’s culture, increase customer focus and drive the recruitment of customer-oriented people. The CEO as CMO also sends a strong message throughout the organization that the customer is at the center of the company’s key preoccupations and that marketing is everybody’s job.
  • Get the CFO on board too. Doing this requires taking some of the fuzziness out of marketing. CCOs should try to produce hard numbers that show a return on investment and a clear impact on the company’s financials. They could also take a refresher course in finance to get a better understanding of where CFOs are coming from. Even something as simple as lunch with the CFO can help CCOs become more fluent financially.
  • Use customer knowledge to build influence. With backing from the big two in the C-suite, CCOs can use their teams’ customer knowledge to influence discussions of product design and pricing, and make a company’s offerings more sensitive to the market. Very few business leaders ask themselves ‘What are my customer headaches?’ But this is such a good question. Companies that can provide a product or service that make people’s lives faster, easier, better or cheaper will always be on the right track.

 

Back in the 1950s, the management guru Peter Drucker wrote that a company has two and only two key functions – marketing and innovation – and that all other functions should support these. Back to basics: Objective number one for the CCO is customer-centricity. This focus must come from the very top and filter down through the whole organization so everyone has the incentive to add value to the customer. Although paying attention to the customer is common sense, unfortunately common sense is less and less common. The CCO must be the first step in the right direction.

So – goodbye to the CMO, hello to the CCO.

 

Dominique Turpin is the Nestlé Professor and President of IMD. He co-directs IMD’s Orchestrating Winning Performance program.

The birth of digital database marketing

5 Apr 2013: Web analytics and database marketing were once used independently of each other, but the two can now be brought together to provide powerful insights and value to an organisation’s marketing efforts, says Katharine Hulls.

Time for marketers to say goodbye to the email open rate

12 Mar 2013: Modern email marketing techniques and deliverability challenges require insight which the open rate can’t deliver, says Steve Henderson.

CRM is back - but this time it's personal

12 Mar 2013: CRM is back, but now it's personal and it’s called marketing automation, says Mark Patron.

Internet data wars: the first skirmishes

4 Mar 2013: Deep Packet Inspection is having an increasingly important impact on the digital marketing and advertising industry, says Tomasz Kolanowski.

How closing the transactional loop could have helped Jessops & HMV

12 Feb 2013: It’s a tragedy to see Jessops and HMV disappear but it's a pointed reminder that bricks-and-mortar retailers need to think hard about how they maintain relationships with their customers, says Dan Brassington.

Harvesting digital: making money out of data

19 Dec 2012: Thanks to the dawn of the digital age, the sheer volume of data now available to marketers is huge – dauntingly so – but that shouldn’t put them off getting to grips with it because if they don’t, someone else surely will, says Sean Jackson.

You cannot annoy someone into 'liking' you

18 Dec 2012: You cannot annoy someone into liking you, yet that is exactly what many direct and digital marketers seem to be doing, says Mark Patron.

PCA boss backs Lord Heseltine's call to foster innovation Britain

13 Nov 12: Postcode Anywhere’s Guy Mucklow has praised Lord Heseltine’s report No stone unturned in pursuit of growth, and has highlighted the importance of trade associations, civil servants and channelling government expenditure towards SMEs, to foster economic growth.

Marketers and data scientists: a burgeoning love story

3 Oct 2012: There is a burgeoning romance between smart marketers and data scientists – and without a doubt, this relationship has the potential to become ‘something serious’, says Lisa Arthur.

Should you be fusing offline and online insights?

17 Aug 2012: The answer is definitely yes, of course, however most organisations have their offline and online teams operating in isolation with neither really understanding what the other is doing, says Debbie Oates.

Don't underestimate the disruption of the Olympics

14 Aug 2012: It’s hard to get your head around just how disruptive the Olympic Games will be for many database marketers this year, says Dwain McDonald.

Now is not the time to be scrimping on DQM...

14 Aug 2012: While an instinctive inclination to cut costs in tough economic times is understable, doing so by scrimping on data quality management is a completely false economy, argues Graham Rhind.

Effective campaign attribution key to justifying marketing optimism

13 Aug 2012: In today’s digital world, traditional aggregate-level data and ‘last-click’ analysis no longer cut it when it comes to building robust, accurate digital marketing attribution models, believes Katharine Hulls.

Is the address dead?

27 Jul 2012: As postal volumes fall and direct marketing becomes a smaller part of a wider range of marketing avenues, is the address dead?